4.6 Article

Romiplostim in adult patients with newly diagnosed or persistent immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) for up to 1 year and in those with chronic ITP for more than 1 year: a subgroup analysis of integrated data from completed romiplostim studies

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
Volume 185, Issue 3, Pages 503-513

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bjh.15803

Keywords

immune thrombocytopenia; newly diagnosed; persistent; thrombopoietin; romiplostim

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The thrombopoietin receptor agonist romiplostim is approved for second-line use in chronic immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), but its effects in patients with ITP for <= 1 year are not well characterized. This analysis of pooled data from 9 studies included patients with ITP for <= 1 year (n = 311) or >1 year (n = 726) who failed first-line treatments and received romiplostim, placebo or standard of care. In subgroup analysis by ITP duration, patient incidences for platelet response at >= 75% of measurements were higher for romiplostim [ITP <= 1 year: 74% (204/277); ITP >1 year: 71% (450/634)] than for placebo/standard of care [ITP <= 1 year: 18% (6/34); ITP >1 year: 9% (8/92)]. Of patients with >= 9 months on study, 16% with ITP <= 1 year and 6% with ITP >1 year discontinued romiplostim and maintained platelet counts >= 50 x 10(9)/l for >= 6 months without ITP treatment (treatment-free remission). Independent of ITP duration, rates of serious adverse events and bleeding were lower with romiplostim than placebo/standard of care and thrombotic events occurred at similar rates. In this analysis, romiplostim and placebo/standard of care had similar safety profiles and romiplostim increased platelet counts in patients with either ITP <= 1 year or ITP >1 year, with more treatment-free remission in those with ITP <= 1 year.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available