4.7 Review

A comparison of deterministic and stochastic approaches for sensitivity analysis in computational systems biology

Journal

BRIEFINGS IN BIOINFORMATICS
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages 527-540

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbz014

Keywords

sensitivity analysis; deterministic simulation; stochastic simulation; mathematical modeling; computational biology; systems biology

Funding

  1. Academy of Finland [311639]
  2. Academy of Finland (AKA) [311639, 311639] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

With the recent rising application of mathematical models in the field of computational systems biology, the interest in sensitivity analysis methods had increased. The stochastic approach, based on chemical master equations, and the deterministic approach, based on ordinary differential equations (ODEs), are the two main approaches for analyzing mathematical models of biochemical systems. In this work, the performance of these approaches to compute sensitivity coefficients is explored in situations where stochastic and deterministic simulation can potentially provide different results (systems with unstable steady states, oscillators with population extinction and bistable systems). We consider two methods in the deterministic approach, namely the direct differential method and the finite difference method, and five methods in the stochastic approach, namely the Girsanov transformation, the independent random number method, the common random number method, the coupled finite difference method and the rejection-based finite difference method. The reviewed methods are compared in terms of sensitivity values and computational time to identify differences in outcome that can highlight conditions in which one approach performs better than the other.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available