4.2 Review

Promoter Methylation Status of the Retinoic Acid Receptor-Beta 2 Gene in Breast Cancer Patients: A Case Control Study and Systematic Review

Journal

BREAST CARE
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages 117-123

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000489874

Keywords

Breast cancer; RAR beta 2; Hypermethylation; Epigenetic; MSP; Iranian population

Funding

  1. Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences Office of Vice Chancellor for Research, Kermanshah, Iran

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: We aimed to determine the promoter methylation status of the retinoic acid receptor-beta 2 (RAR beta 2) gene among breast cancer patients and to review relevant studies in this field in various populations. Methods: We analyzed 400 samples which comprised blood specimens from 102 breast cancer patients, 102 first-degree female relatives of patients, 100 cancer-free females, 48 breast cancer tissues, and 48 adjacent normal breast tissues from the same patients. The RAR beta 2 methylation status was determined using methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (MSP) and DNA sequencing methods. Results: The presence of combined partially methylated (MU) and fully methylated (MM) forms of the RAR beta 2 gene (MU+MM) in the blood of patients was associated with susceptibility to breast cancer (odds ratio = 4.7, p = 0.05). A significantly higher frequency of the MM genotype was observed in cancer tissue (10.4%) compared to matched adjacent normal breast tissue (0%) (p = 0.02). Conclusion: We found a higher frequency of RAR beta 2 gene methylation in the blood and cancer tissues of patients compared to the blood of controls and adjacent normal breast tissues. The survey of studies on various populations demonstrated a higher RAR beta 2 methylation frequency in breast cancer patients compared to normal individuals, and many reports suggest a significant association between hypermethylation of the gene and susceptibility to breast cancer. (c) 2019 S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available