4.3 Article

Cortical Inhibition of Face and Jaw Muscle Activity and Discomfort Induced by Repetitive and Paired-Pulse TMS During an Overt Object Naming Task

Journal

BRAIN TOPOGRAPHY
Volume 32, Issue 3, Pages 418-434

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10548-019-00698-9

Keywords

rTMS; cSP; Tolerability; Tongue; Language; Inhibition

Funding

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG) [INST 1850/50-1]
  2. University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine [Gerok 8/2016]
  3. State Research Funding granted for the Kuopio University Hospital Catchment Area [5041730]
  4. Kaute Foundation, Helsinki, Finland
  5. Paulo Foundation, Helsinki, Finland
  6. Finnish Concordia Fund, Helsinki, Finland

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Modulatory effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) strongly depend on the stimulation parameters. Here, we compared the immediate, task-locked inhibitory effects on speech-related muscles and the tolerability of different TMS protocols during a language production task. Repetitive TMS (rTMS) and paired-pulse TMS (PP) were applied in 13 healthy subjects over the primary motor cortex (M1) during a finger-tapping/tongue-twisting tasks. The lowest subject-specific TMS intensity leading to movement disruptions wasused for TMS over left-sided speech-related areas during picture naming. Here, time-locked PP and rTMS (10/30/50Hz; randomized sequence) were applied. Cortical silent periods (cSPs) were analyzed from electromyography obtained from various face muscles. 30Hz- and 50Hz-rTMS reliably evoked tongue movement disruption (ICC=0.65) at lower rTMS intensities compared to 10Hz-rTMS or PP. CSPs were elicited from the left hemisphere by all TMS protocols, most reliably by PP (p<0.001). Also, cSPs with longest durations were induced by PP. Exploratory analyses of PP suggest that the trials with strongest motor inhibitory effects (presence of cSP) were associated with more articulatory naming errors, hence hinting at the utility of TMS-elicited, facial cSP for mapping of language production areas. Higher-frequency rTMS and PP evoked stronger inhibitory effects as compared to 10Hz-rTMS during a language task, thus enabling a probably more efficient and tolerable routine for language mapping. The spatial distribution of cranial muscle cSPs implies that TMS might affect not only M1, but also distant parts of the language network.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available