4.5 Review

Unsupervised excitation: GABAergic dysfunctions in Alzheimer's disease

Journal

BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 1707, Issue -, Pages 216-226

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2018.11.042

Keywords

Alzheimer's disease; GABAergic neurons; Inhibition excitation balance; Neuronal network dysfunction hypothesis; Mouse model of AD; Human AD

Categories

Funding

  1. DZNE
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SFB1089, C01, 1306]
  3. CoEN [CoEN3018]
  4. EU (ERA-NET MicroSynDep)
  5. Deutsche Studienstiftung

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is characterized by the classical hallmarks of AD-deposition and tau-pathology that are thought to ultimately lead to synapse and neuron loss. Although long known, neuroinflammation has recently attracted a substantial amount of attention by researchers due to genome wide association studies (GWAS) that identified microglia associated genes to be correlated with sporadic AD. Besides that, cholinergic degeneration and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) abnormalities have been identified in the brains of AD patients already decades ago, but have not received much attention over the last ten years. Recently, the neuronal network dysfunction hypothesis has revived interest in how impairments of neuronal communication at the network level lead to epileptiform activity and disrupted oscillations observed in the brains of AD patients and mouse models. Thereby, deficits in neuronal networks involved in learning and memory might ultimately cause memory impairments. In this context, an imbalance between excitation and inhibition has been hypothesized to contribute to neuronal network dysfunction. Here, disturbances of cholinergic and GABAergic transmission might play a crucial role. In this review, we will focus on GABAergic dysfunction in AD and mouse models of AD and how those might relate to neuronal network aberration and memory impairment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available