4.8 Article

Fit-for-purpose?' - challenges and opportunities for applications of blockchain technology in the future of healthcare

Journal

BMC MEDICINE
Volume 17, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12916-019-1296-7

Keywords

Blockchain; Distributed ledger technology; Healthcare technology; Health informatics; Supply chain; Clinical trials; Medical licensure; Genomics; Electronic health records

Funding

  1. National Human Genome Research Institute
  2. US National Institutes of Health [K99HG009680, R00HG009680]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Blockchain is a shared distributed digital ledger technology that can better facilitate data management, provenance and security, and has the potential to transform healthcare. Importantly, blockchain represents a data architecture, whose application goes far beyond Bitcoin - the cryptocurrency that relies on blockchain and has popularized the technology. In the health sector, blockchain is being aggressively explored by various stakeholders to optimize business processes, lower costs, improve patient outcomes, enhance compliance, and enable better use of healthcare-related data. However, critical in assessing whether blockchain can fulfill the hype of a technology characterized as revolutionary' and disruptive', is the need to ensure that blockchain design elements consider actual healthcare needs from the diverse perspectives of consumers, patients, providers, and regulators. In addition, answering the real needs of healthcare stakeholders, blockchain approaches must also be responsive to the unique challenges faced in healthcare compared to other sectors of the economy. In this sense, ensuring that a health blockchain is fit-for-purpose' is pivotal. This concept forms the basis for this article, where we share views from a multidisciplinary group of practitioners at the forefront of blockchain conceptualization, development, and deployment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available