4.5 Article

Urea dilution of serum for reproducible anti-HSV1 IgG avidity index

Journal

BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 19, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12879-019-3769-x

Keywords

Herpes simplex; IgG; Avidity; ELISA; Primary infection; Reactivated infection

Funding

  1. Vasterbotten County Council
  2. Swedish Association for Clinical Microbiology (FKM, SLS)
  3. Swedish Medical Association
  4. Swedish Dementia Association
  5. Trolle-Wachtmeister foundation
  6. Northland Dementia Fund
  7. Swedish Alzheimer Fund
  8. Stohne foundation
  9. Umea University Foundation for Medical Research
  10. Kempe foundations

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV1), establishes life-long latency and can cause symptoms during both first-time infection and later reactivation. The aim of the present study was to describe a protocol to generate a reliable and discriminative avidity index (AI) for anti-HSV1 IgG content in human sera. Human serum from two distinct cohorts; one a biobank collection (Betula) (n = 28), and one from a clinical diagnostics laboratory at Northern Sweden University Hospital (NUS) (n = 18), were assessed for presence of IgG antibodies against HSV1 by a commercially available ELISA-kit. Addition of urea at the incubation step reduces effective binding, and the ratio between urea treated sample and non-treated sample was used to express an avidity index (AI) for individual samples. AI score ranged between 43.2 and 73.4% among anti-HSV1 positive biobank sera. Clinical samples ranged between 36.3 and 74.9%. Reproducibility expressed as an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was estimated at 0.948 (95% CI: 0.900-0.979) and 0.989 (95% CI 0.969-0.996) in the biobank and clinical samples, respectively. The method allows for AI scoring of anti-HSV1 IgG from individual human sera with a single measurement. The least significant change between two measurements at the p < 0.05 level was estimated at 5.4 and 3.2 points, respectively, for the two assessed cohorts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available