4.7 Article

Dominant activating RAC2 mutation with lymphopenia, immunodeficiency, and cytoskeletal defects

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 133, Issue 18, Pages 1977-1988

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2018-11-886028

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health Intramural Research Program, NIAID
  2. National Cancer Institute [HHSN261200800001E, P01 CA203657]
  3. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [ZIABC011633] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [ZIAAI000614, ZIAAI000646, ZIAAI000647, ZIAAI001175] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 2 (RAC2), through interactions with reduced NAD phosphate oxidase component p67(phox), activates neutrophil superoxide production, whereas interactions with p21-activated kinase are necessary for fMLF-induced actin remodeling. We identified 3 patients with de novo RAC2[E62K] mutations resulting in severe T-and B-cell lymphopenia, myeloid dysfunction, and recurrent respiratory infections. Neutrophils from RAC2[E62K] patients exhibited excessive superoxide production, impaired fMLF-directed chemotaxis, and abnormal macropinocytosis. Cell lines transfected with RAC2[E62K] displayed characteristics of active guanosine triphosphate (GTP)-bound RAC2 including enhanced superoxide production and increased membrane ruffling. Biochemical studies demonstrated that RAC2[E62K] retains intrinsic GTP hydrolysis; however, GTPase-activating protein failed to accelerate hydrolysis resulting in prolonged active GTPbound RAC2. Rac2(+/E62K) mice phenocopy the T-and B-cell lymphopenia, increased neutrophil F-actin, and excessive superoxide production seen in patients. This gain-of-function mutation highlights a specific, nonredundant role for RAC2 in hematopoietic cells that discriminates RAC2 from the related, ubiquitous RAC1.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available