4.5 Article

Cross-Interaction Chromatography-Based QSAR Model for Early-Stage Screening to Facilitate Enhanced Developability of Monoclonal Antibody Therapeutics

Journal

BIOTECHNOLOGY JOURNAL
Volume 14, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/biot.201800696

Keywords

cross-reactivity; developability; early-stage screening; monoclonal antibodies; QSAR

Funding

  1. H2020 Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions [643056] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) constitute a rapidly growing biopharmaceutical sector. However, their growth is impeded by developability issues such as polyspecificity and lack of solubility, which leads to attrition as well as manufacturing failures. In this study a multitool hybrid quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) model development framework is described. This framework uses four novel datasets derived from the primary sequences of IgG1-kappa-humanized mAbs with varying degrees of resolutions. Unsupervised pattern recognition is first performed on the descriptor sets to visualize any intrinsic property-based clustering, followed by regression of descriptors against cross-interaction chromatography (CIC) retention times. Model optimization is performed via unsupervised variable reduction followed by supervised variable selection. Finally, the models and datasets are benchmarked based on the regression model performance metrics such as R-2, Q(2), and RMSE.The results show that datasets containing localized descriptors rather than averaged value over the entire protein have better predictive performance of CIC retention behavior with R-2 > 0.8 and RMSE < 0.3. Furthermore, the results indicate the physicochemical, electronic, and topological properties of hypervariable regions of antibodies that contribute most to the CIC retention times. The results of these studies could contribute to early-stage screening and better design of mAbs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available