4.8 Review

Anaerobic membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment: Novel configurations, fouling control and energy considerations

Journal

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
Volume 283, Issue -, Pages 358-372

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.03.061

Keywords

Anaerobic membrane bioreactor; Novel configurations; Membrane fouling; Energy recovery; Wastewater treatment

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea - Ministry of Science and ICT [2017R1A2B4007804]
  2. Unit of Scientific Research Project Coordination (Bilimsel Arastirma Projeleri Koordinatorlugu, BAP) of Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey [FOA-2018-8183]
  3. Higher Education Commission (HEC), Pakistan under NRPU program [3514]
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2017R1A2B4007804] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Water shortage, public health and environmental protection are key motives to treat wastewater. The widespread adoption of wastewater as a resource depends upon development of an energy-efficient technology. Anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) technology has gained increasing popularity due to their ability to offset the disadvantages of conventional treatment technologies. However there are several hurdles, yet to climb over, for wider spread and scale-up of the technology. This paper reviews fundamental aspects of anaerobic digestion of wastewater, and identifies the challenges and opportunities to the further development of AnMBRs. Membrane fouling and its implications are discussed, and strategies to control membrane fouling are proposed. Novel AnMBR configurations are discussed as an integrated approach to overcome technology limitations. Energy demand and recovery in AnMBRs is analyzed. Finally key issues that require urgent attention to facilitate global penetration of AnMBR technology are highlighted.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available