4.5 Article

Influenza Hemagglutinin Modulates Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-Bisphosphate Membrane Clustering

Journal

BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 116, Issue 5, Pages 893-909

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2019.01.017

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R15GM116002, R15GM094713]
  2. Institutional Development Award from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health [P20GM103423]
  3. Maine Technology Institute [MTAF1106, 2061]
  4. University of Maine Office of the Vice President for Research
  5. Maine Economic Improvement Fund
  6. Fulbright Program
  7. EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT [ZIAHD001415] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The lipid phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) forms nanoscopic clusters in cell plasma membranes; however, the processes determining PIP2 mobility and thus its spatial patterns are not fully understood. Using super-resolution imaging of living cells, we find that PIP2 is tightly colocalized with and modulated by overexpression of the influenza viral protein hemagglutinin (HA). Within and near clusters, HA and PIP2 follow a similar spatial dependence, which can be described by an HA-dependent potential gradient; PIP2 molecules move as if they are attracted to the center of clusters by a radial force of 0.079 +/- 0.002 pN in HAb2 cells. The measured clustering and dynamics of PIP2 are inconsistent with the unmodified forms of the raft, tether, and fence models. Rather, we found that the spatial PIP2 distributions and how they change in time are explained via a novel, to our knowledge, dynamic mechanism: a radial gradient of PIP2 binding sites that are themselves mobile. This model may be useful for understanding other biological membrane domains whose distributions display gradients in density while maintaining their mobility.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available