4.3 Article

Plasma free DNA: Evaluation of temperature-associated storage effects observed for Roche Cell-Free DNA collection tubes

Journal

BIOCHEMIA MEDICA
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

CROATIAN SOC MEDICAL BIOCHEMISTRY & LABORATORY MEDICINE
DOI: 10.11613/BM.2019.010904

Keywords

cell-free nucleic acids; pre-analytical phase; quality improvement

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Standardized pre-analytical blood sample procedures for the analysis of circulating cell-free DNA (ccfDNA) are still not available. Therefore, the present study aimed at evaluating the impact of storage conditions related to different times (24 and 48 h) and temperatures (room temperature (RT) and 4 - 8 degrees C) on the plasma ccfDNA concentration of blood samples drawn into Cell-Free DNA collection tubes (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). Materials and methods: Venous blood from 30 healthy individuals was collected into five 8.5 mL Cell-Free DNA Collection Tubes (Roche Diagnostics GmbH) each. Plasma samples were processed at time point of blood collection (tube 1), and after storage under the following conditions: 24 h at RT (tube 2) or 4-8 degrees C (tube 3), and 48 h at RT (tube 4) or 4 - 8 degrees C (tube 5). Circulating cell-free DNA concentrations were determined by EvaGreen chemistry-based droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). Results: No statistically significant differences between median (interquartile range) plasma ccfDNA concentrations (ng/mL) at time point of blood collection (3.17 (2.13 - 3.76)) and after storage for 24 h (RT: 3.02 (2.41- 3.68); 4-8 degrees C: 3.21 (2.19 - 3.46)) and 48 h (RT: 3.13 (2.10 - 3.76); 4-8 degrees C: 3.09 (2.19 - 3.50)) were observed (P values from 0.102 - 0.975). Conclusions: No unwanted release of genomic DNA from white blood cells could be detected in plasma samples after tube storage for 24 and 48 h regardless of storage temperature.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available