Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Joint use of attribute importance rankings and non-attendance data in choice experiments
Ali Chalak et al.
EUROPEAN REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS (2016)
Testing hypothetical bias with a real choice experiment using respondents' own money
Riccarda Moser et al.
EUROPEAN REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS (2014)
Revealing additional preference heterogeneity with an extended random parameter logit model: the case of extra virgin olive oil
Ahmed Yangui et al.
SPANISH JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH (2014)
Are Results from Non-hypothetical Choice-based Conjoint Analyses and Non-hypothetical Recoded-ranking Conjoint Analyses Similar?
Faical Akaichi et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS (2013)
ON THE USE OF HONESTY PRIMING TASKS TO MITIGATE HYPOTHETICAL BIAS IN CHOICE EXPERIMENTS
Tiziana de-Magistris et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS (2013)
Consumer preferences for food labelling attributes: Comparing direct ranking and best-worst scaling for measurement of attribute importance, preference intensity and attribute dominance
Carl Johan Lagerkvist
FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE (2013)
Best worst discrete choice experiments in health: Methods and an application
Emily Lancsar et al.
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE (2013)
Conjoint Analysis Versus Rating and Ranking for Values Elicitation and Clarification in Colorectal Cancer Screening
Michael P. Pignone et al.
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE (2012)
Exploring Scale Effects of Best/Worst Rank Ordered Choice Data to Estimate Benefits of Tourism in Alpine Grazing Commons
Riccardo Scarpa et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS (2011)
Best-worst scaling vs. discrete choice experiments: An empirical comparison using social care data
Dimitris Potoglou et al.
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE (2011)
Obtaining more information from conjoint experiments by best-worst choices
Bart Vermeulen et al.
COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS (2010)
Using Best-Worst Scaling Choice Experiments to Measure Public Perceptions and Preferences for Healthcare Reform in Australia
Jordan J. Louviere et al.
PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH (2010)
Choice Certainty and Consistency in Repeated Choice Experiments
Roy Brouwer et al.
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS (2010)
How Closely Do Hypothetical Surveys and Laboratory Experiments Predict Field Behavior?
Jae Bong Chang et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS (2009)
Complexity in choice experiments: choice of the status quo alternative and implications for welfare measurement
Peter Boxall et al.
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS (2009)
Commercial opportunities for olive oil from Castilla-La Mancha (Spain)
Rodolfo Bernabeu et al.
GRASAS Y ACEITES (2009)
Would you choose your preferred option?: Comparing choice and recoded ranking experiments
Alejandro Caparros et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS (2008)
An incentive compatible conjoint ranking mechanism
Jayson L. Lusk et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS (2008)
Reliability of individual valuations of public and private goods: Choice consistency, response time, and preference refinement
Thomas C. Brown et al.
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS (2008)
An incentive-aligned mechanism for conjoint analysis
Min Ding
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH (2007)
Discrete choice survey experiments: A comparison using flexible methods
Juha Siikamaki et al.
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT (2007)
Measuring welfare effects in models with random coefficients
E Meijer et al.
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECONOMETRICS (2006)
Some probabilistic models of best, worst, and best-worst choices
AAJ Marley et al.
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY (2005)
A meta-analysis of hypothetical bias in stated preference valuation
JJ Murphy et al.
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS (2005)
Are choice experiments incentive compatible? A test with quality differentiated beef steaks
JL Lusk et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS (2004)
What experimental protocol influence disparities between actual and hypothetical stated values?
JA List et al.
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS (2001)
A comparison of conjoint analysis response formats
KJ Boyle et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS (2001)
Share Paper
