4.0 Article

First-trimester ultrasound features associated with subsequent miscarriage: A prospective study

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ajo.12944

Keywords

first trimester; logistic regression; miscarriage; trophoblast; ultrasound; uterine artery

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background First-trimester miscarriage is common, with women increasingly offered an ultrasound scan early in the first trimester to assess the status of their pregnancy. Ultrasound is uniquely situated to significantly impact the clinical management of these women. Aims This study aims to determine whether there were any differences in the early ultrasound appearances of pregnancies that continued to be viable or resulted in miscarriage before 12 weeks gestation. Materials and Methods This was a prospective cohort study including ultrasound measurements: mean sac diameter (MSD), yolk sac diameter (YSD), crown-rump length (CRL), fetal heart rate (FHR), trophoblast thickness, trophoblast volume (TTV) and mean uterine artery pulsatility index (meanUAPI). Regression models were fitted for each parameter and Z-scores compared between cohorts that progressed or miscarried after the scan but before 12 weeks gestation. Logistic regression analysis was used to create a prediction model for miscarriage prior to 12 weeks gestation based on the standardised ultrasound measurements recorded during the early first-trimester scan. Results Comparison of Z-Scores for meanUAPI, TTV, FHR and MSD demonstrated significant variation between the two groups. The proposed logistic regression model resulted in an area under the receiver operator curve of 0.81. At a false-positive rate of 30%, the model resulted in a sensitivity of 76% (95% CI 64-89%). Conclusion The combination of FHR, meanUAPI, TTV in a prediction model for miscarriage may prove to be of value for ongoing pregnancy management in the first trimester.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available