4.2 Article

Monte Carlo simulation of the SABRE PoP background

Journal

ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS
Volume 106, Issue -, Pages 1-9

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.astropartphys.2018.10.005

Keywords

SABRE; WIMP; Dark matter; Annual modulation; Nai(Tl)

Funding

  1. INFN (Italy)
  2. NSF (USA)
  3. ARC (Australia) [LE170100162, LE16010080, DP170101675, LP150100075]
  4. European Union [703650]
  5. Australian Research Council [LE170100162] Funding Source: Australian Research Council
  6. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [703650] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

SABRE (Sodium-iodide with Active Background REjection) is a direct dark matter search experiment based on an array of radio-pure Nal(Tl) crystals surrounded by a liquid scintillator veto. Twin SABRE experiments in the Northern and Southern Hemispheres will differentiate a dark matter signal from seasonal and local effects. The experiment is currently in a Proof-of-Principle (PoP) phase, whose goal is to demonstrate that the background rate is low enough to carry out an independent search for a dark matter signal, with sufficient sensitivity to confirm or refute the DAMA result during the following full-scale experimental phase. The impact of background radiation from the detector materials and the experimental site needs to be carefully investigated, including both intrinsic and cosmogenically activated radioactivity. Based on the best knowledge of the most relevant sources of background, we have performed a detailed Monte Carlo study evaluating the expected background in the dark matter search spectral region. The simulation model described in this paper guides the design of the full-scale experiment and will be fundamental for the interpretation of the measured background and hence for the extraction of a possible dark matter signal. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available