4.4 Article

Anatomic and functional evaluation of the levator ani muscle after an obstetric anal sphincter injury

Journal

ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS
Volume 299, Issue 4, Pages 1001-1006

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00404-019-05070-7

Keywords

Anal sphincter obstetric injury; Anal incontinence; Levator ani

Funding

  1. Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Deu
  2. Sant Joan de Deu Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PurposeTo study the relationship between symptoms of anal incontinence (AI) and the anatomy and functionality of the levator ani muscle in women with a history of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI).MethodsThis is a cohort study including patients with OASI from 2013 to 2016. Patients were assessed by a physical examination, endoanal ultrasound using Starck Scale, perineometry and 4D transperineal ultrasound. AI in all patients was measured with the Wexner scale. Correlation between variables has been analyzed in these patients.Results72 patients were analyzed: 28 with a IIIA degree tear, 26 with a IIIB, 13 with a IIIC and 5 with a IV. 38 patients showed a residual anal sphincter (AS) defect on endoanal ultrasound with an average Starck score of 6.53.7. 21 patients expressed AI, withan average Wexner score of 4.1 +/- 2.4. In 27 (37.5%) patients, a levator ani avulsion was observed: 17 unilateral and 10 bilateral. Patients with a levator ani defect had weaker pelvic floor muscle (PFM) function. These differences were statistically significant with perineometry (p=0.01 and p=0.03) but not for the Oxford test (p=0.08). Patients with a residual AS defect as well as an injury to the levator ani muscle expressed greater AI symptomatology than patients with residual sphincter injury who maintain the integrity of the levator ani: Wexner 4.9 0.9 vs 3.3 1 (p=0.02).Conclusions p id=Par4 The PFM has correlation with AI symptom development in patients with a history of OASI. Therefore, we suggest a key role of anatomical and functional assessments of the levator ani muscle in these patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available