4.6 Review

Lost in translation: Interpreting cardiac muscle mechanics data in clinical practice

Journal

ARCHIVES OF BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOPHYSICS
Volume 662, Issue -, Pages 213-218

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.abb.2018.12.021

Keywords

Failing myocardium; Myosin modulators; Sarcomere-based therapies; Biophysical measurements; Cross-bridge behavior; In vivo function

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [P30 EY011373]
  2. American Heart Association [16POST30730000]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Current inotropic therapies improve systolic function in heart failure patients but also elicit undesirable side effects such as arrhythmias and increased intracellular Ca2+ transients. In order to maintain myocyte Ca2+ homeostasis, the increased cytosolic Ca2+ needs to be actively transported back to sarcoplasmic reticulum leading to depleted ATP reserves. Thus, an emerging approach is to design sarcomere-based treatments to correct impaired contractility via a direct and allosteric modulation of myosin's intrinsic force-generating behavior -a concept that potentially avoids the off-target effects. To achieve this goal, various biophysical approaches are utilized to investigate the mechanistic impact of sarcomeric modulators but information derived from diverse approaches is not fully integrated into therapeutic applications. This is in part due to the lack of information that provides a coherent connecting link between biophysical data to in vivo function. Hence, our ability to clearly discern the drug-mediated impact on whole-heart function is diminished. Reducing this translational barrier can significantly accelerate clinical progress related to sarcomere-based therapies by optimizing drug-dosing and treatment duration protocols based on information obtained from biophysical studies. Therefore, we attempt to link biophysical mechanical measurements obtained in isolated cardiac muscle and in vivo contractile function.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available