4.7 Article

Effects of dietary protein and lipid levels on growth, body composition and nutrient utilization of Channa striata

Journal

AQUACULTURE
Volume 501, Issue -, Pages 368-373

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.11.054

Keywords

Protein requirement; Lipid requirement; Protein-sparing effect; Nutrient utilization

Funding

  1. Skretting Aquaculture Research Centre, Norway

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Very limited information is available on nutrient requirements of Channa striata, particularly during the grow-out stage. A study was carried out to study the requirement and utilization of protein and lipid by Channa striata growing from 31 g to similar to 200 g. Nine experimental diets with graded levels of dietary protein and lipid were formulated using practical ingredients. Increasing dietary crude protein content from 43.4% to 55.6% at 11% dietary lipid content resulted in increases of weight gain, amount of feed consumed, specific growth rate, and thermal-unit growth coefficient. The crude protein requirement of Channa striata was estimated by the saturation kinetics model to be 51.6% dry matter (DM) for growth and 52.1% DM for protein deposition. On the digestible protein basis, the requirement of Channa striata was estimated to be 47.2% DM for growth and 47.8% DM for protein deposition. Increasing lipid content in diets from 7.5% to 23.1% in this study resulted in linear decreases of fish growth and feed intake. Apparently Channa striata cannot tolerate high dietary lipid levels; lipid levels of > 19% DM could negatively affect growth performance. It was also revealed that dietary lipids did not have a protein-sparing effect in Channa striata. Results from this study not only contribute to a better understanding of the nutrient requirement and utilization of Channa striata, but also would be helpful for the development of cost-effective sustainable practical feed formulations for this fish species.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available