4.8 Article

Would China's power industry benefit from nationwide carbon emission permit trading? An optimization model-based ex post analysis on abatement cost savings

Journal

APPLIED ENERGY
Volume 235, Issue -, Pages 978-986

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.11.011

Keywords

By-production approach; Data envelopment analysis; Directional distance function; Emission trading system; Opportunity abatement cost; Marginal abatement cost

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71871022, 71471018, 71521002, 71828401]
  2. Social Science Foundation of Beijing [16JDGLB013]
  3. Joint Development Program of Beijing Municipal Commission of Education
  4. Fok Ying Tung Education Foundation [161076]
  5. National Key RD Program [2016YFA0602603]
  6. China Scholarships Council [201706030023]
  7. International Clean Energy Talent Program of Chinese Scholarship Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The nationwide carbon emission permit trading scheme has been launched in China's power industry sector by the end of 2017. The estimation of abatement costs savings from carbon emission permit trading can provide valuable guidelines and support to environmental regulatory policies on controlling CO2 emissions. By applying a parametric and nonparametric integrating approach and conducting an ex post analysis in two scenarios (i.e., with and without carbon emission permit trading simulation), this study provides a simulative calculation of the opportunity abatement cost savings and the marginal abatement cost savings from carbon emission permit trading in China's power industry of 30 provinces. The simulation results show that: (i) A 13% annually average potential on the opportunity abatement cost savings (i.e., 1024 billion yuan) would be realized if introducing a nationwide emission permit trading system in China's power industry during 2011-2015. (ii) Meanwhile, the marginal abatement cost savings that range from 39 to 47 yuan/ton would be realized through emission permit trading. (iii) Provinces of Xinjiang and Henan show the largest absolute opportunity abatement cost savings from trading, while Qinghai province shows the highest percentage increase in opportunity abatement cost savings. (iv) Although there is significant difference in the marginal abatement cost among provinces, the marginal abatement cost savings from trading would occur for most China's provinces.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available