4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

The effect of combined inositol supplementation on maternal metabolic profile in pregnancies complicated by metabolic syndrome and obesity

Journal

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.05.038

Keywords

blood pressure; C57BL/6J mice; endothelial nitric oxide synthase inositol; insulin resistance; knockout mice metabolic syndrome; obesity; pregnancy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Myoinositol and D-chiroinositol improve insulin resistance in women with obesity and gestational diabetes and in postmenopausal women with metabolic syndrome. We previously reported that offspring born to hypertensive dams lacking endothelial nitric oxide synthase and fed a high-fat diet develop metabolic-like syndrome phenotype. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to investigate the effect of a mixture of myoinositol/D-chiroinositol supplementation during pregnancy on the maternal metabolic profile in pregnancies complicated by the metabolic-like syndrome and obesity using a pregnant mouse model. STUDY DESIGN: Female heterozygous endothelial nitric oxide synthase(-/+) mice with moderate hypertension were placed on a high-fat diet for 4 weeks to induce a metabolic-like syndrome phenotype. Similarly, wild-type C57BL/6 mice were placed on a high-fat diet for 4 weeks to induce a murine obesity model. Mice were then bred with wild-type males. On gestational day 1, dams were randomly allocated to receive either a mixture of myoinositol/D-chiroinositol in water (7.2/0.18 mg/mL, respectively) or water as control (placebo). At term (gestational day 18), maternal weights, systolic blood pressure, and a glucose tolerance test were obtained. Dams were then killed; pups and placentas were weighed and maternal blood collected. Serum levels of metabolic biomarkers relevant to diabetes and obesity (ghrelin, gastric inhibitory peptide, glucagon-like peptide 1, glucagon, insulin, leptin, resistin) were measured by a multiplex enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Analysis was done comparing metabolic-like syndrome-myoinositol/D-chiroinositoletreated vs metabolic-like syndromeenontreated mice and obese-myoinositol/ D-chiroinositoletreated vs obese nontreated mice. RESULTS: Mean systolic blood pressure was lower in metabolic-like syndrome pregnant mice treated with myoinositol/D-chiroinositol compared with placebo (P =.04), whereas there was no difference in systolic blood pressure between treated and placebo-treated obese pregnant mice. Pregnant metabolic-like syndrome mice treated with myoinositol/D-chiroinositol showed lower glucose values during the glucose tolerance test and in the area under the curve (myoinositol/ D-chiroinositol: 17512.5 +/- 3984.4 vs placebo: 29687.14 +/- 8258.7; P =.003), but no differences were seen in the obese pregnant mice. Leptin serum levels were lower in the metabolic-like syndrome-myoinositol/ D-chiroinositoletreated mice compared with the placebo group (myoinositol/D-chiroinositol: 16985 +/- 976.4 pg/dL vs placebo: 24181.9 +/- 3128.2 pg/dL, P =.045). No other differences were seen in any of the remaining serum metabolic biomarkers studied in metabolic-like syndrome and in obese pregnant mice. Maternal weight gain was not different in the pregnant metabolic-like syndrome dams, whereas it was lower in the obese myoinositol/D-chiroinositoletreated dams compared with the placebo group (myoinositol/D-chiroinositol: 10.9 +/- 0.5 g vs 12.6 +/- 0.6 g, P =.04). Fetal and placental weights did not differ between myoinositol/Dchiroinositoletreated and nontreated pregnant dams with metabolic-like syndrome and obesity. CONCLUSION: Combined inositol treatment during pregnancy improves blood pressure, glucose levels at the glucose tolerance test, and leptin levels in pregnant dams with metabolic-like syndrome phenotype but not in obese pregnant dams. In addition, inositol treatment was associated with lower gestational weight gain in the obese but not in the metabolic-like syndrome pregnant dams.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available