4.7 Article

Effect of montmorillonite/polypyrrole ratio and oxidizing agent on structure and electrical conductivity of intercalated nanocomposites

Journal

APPLIED CLAY SCIENCE
Volume 168, Issue -, Pages 459-468

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.clay.2018.12.015

Keywords

Polypyrrole; Montmorillonite; Oxidizing agent; Intercalation; Electrical conductivity; Molecular modeling

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports from the National Programme of Sustainability (NPS II) project IT4Innovations excellence in science [LQ1602]
  2. ERDF in the IT4Innovations national supercomputing center - path to exascale project within the OPRDE [CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_013/0001791]
  3. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports [SP2017/65, SP2018/95]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Polypyrrole/montmorillonite (PPy/Mt) nanocomposites with different amount of PPy were prepared using two different oxidizing agents, ammonium peroxydisulfate and ferric chloride. The nanocomposites in powder form were studied using thermogravimetry, X-ray powder diffraction, infrared and Raman spectroscopy, molecular modeling, and electrical measurements. Structure and conductivity of the nanocomposites in dependence on the PPy amount and the oxidizing agent used were compared with pristine PPy samples. Use of ferric chloride led to the conductivity two orders of magnitude higher in comparison with ammonium peroxydisulfate. Molecular modeling revealed regular arrangement of PPy chains in Mt. interlayer space and higher intercalation rate for samples prepared using ferric chloride. Tablets pressed from the nanocomposites exhibit anisotropy in electrical conductivity. Surface morphology of the tablets was studied using atomic force microscopy. For PPy amount similar to 32 mass%, the highest conductivity (49 S/m) and anisotropy factor (224) were reached. Possible use of the tablets as pressure sensors was demonstrated.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available