4.7 Article

Machine learning identifies an immunological pattern associated with multiple juvenile idiopathic arthritis subtypes

Journal

ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES
Volume 78, Issue 5, Pages 617-628

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214354

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. ERC Starting Grant IMMUNO
  2. FWO
  3. BBSRC [BBS/E/B/000C0428, BBS/E/B/000C0427] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most common class of childhood rheumatic diseases, with distinct disease subsets that may have diverging pathophysiological origins. Both adaptive and innate immune processes have been proposed as primary drivers, which may account for the observed clinical heterogeneity, but few high-depth studies have been performed. Methods Here we profiled the adaptive immune system of 85 patients with JIA and 43 age-matched controls with indepth flow cytometry and machine learning approaches. Results Immune profiling identified immunological changes in patients with JIA. This immune signature was shared across a broad spectrum of childhood inflammatory diseases. The immune signature was identified in clinically distinct subsets of JIA, but was accentuated in patients with systemic JIA and those patients with active disease. Despite the extensive overlap in the immunological spectrum exhibited by healthy children and patients with JIA, machine learning analysis of the data set proved capable of discriminating patients with JIA from healthy controls with similar to 90% accuracy. Conclusions These results pave the way for large-scale immune phenotyping longitudinal studies of JIA. The ability to discriminate between patients with JIA and healthy individuals provides proof of principle for the use of machine learning to identify immune signatures that are predictive to treatment response group.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available