4.6 Article

On packet scheduling with adversarial jamming and speedup

Journal

ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH
Volume 298, Issue 1-2, Pages 7-42

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10479-019-03153-x

Keywords

Packet scheduling; Adversarial jamming; Online algorithms; Throughput maximization; Resource augmentation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This research focuses on packet scheduling under adversarial jamming, aiming to develop an algorithm with the optimal competitive ratio under certain conditions. A universal algorithm is proposed to work for any speedup and packet sizes, achieving competitive performance close to the optimum for deterministic algorithms.
In Packet Scheduling with Adversarial Jamming, packets of arbitrary sizes arrive over time to be transmitted over a channel in which instantaneous jamming errors occur at times chosen by the adversary and not known to the algorithm. The transmission taking place at the time of jamming is corrupt, and the algorithm learns this fact immediately. An online algorithm maximizes the total size of packets it successfully transmits and the goal is to develop an algorithm with the lowest possible asymptotic competitive ratio, where the additive constant may depend on packet sizes. Our main contribution is a universal algorithm that works for any speedup and packet sizes and, unlike previous algorithms for the problem, it does not need to know these parameters in advance. We show that this algorithm guarantees 1-competitiveness with speedup 4, making it the first known algorithm to maintain 1-competitiveness with a moderate speedup in the general setting of arbitrary packet sizes. We also prove a lower bound of phi+1 approximate to 2.618on the speedup of any 1-competitive deterministic algorithm, showing that our algorithm is close to the optimum. Additionally, we formulate a general framework for analyzing our algorithm locally and use it to show upper bounds on its competitive ratio for speedups in [1, 4) and for several special cases, recovering some previously known results, each of which had a dedicated proof. In particular, our algorithm is 3-competitive without speedup, matching both the (worst-case) performance of the algorithm by Jurdzinski et al. (Proceedings of the 12th workshop on approximation and online algorithms (WAOA), LNCS 8952, pp 193-206, 2015. ) and the lower bound by Anta et al. (J Sched 19(2):135-152, 2016. ).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available