4.5 Article

Evaluation of neutronic safety parameters of the BAEC TRIGA Research Reactor with Wet Central Tube

Journal

ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY
Volume 124, Issue -, Pages 533-540

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2018.10.033

Keywords

TRIGA Research Reactor; Central Tube (CT); Nuclear safety; Core excess reactivity; Shutdown margin

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nuclear safety and controlling system is a prime issue for the operation of a nuclear reactor. Control rod worth is one of the important neutronic safety parameters to ensure the safe operation of a nuclear reactor and experimental research. Control rod reactivity depends on neutron flux of the core and core configuration of a reactor. In this study, the control rod reactivity, core excess reactivity and shutdown margin with Wet Central Tube (WCT) of the BAEC TRIGA Research Reactor (BTRR) have been measured. The change of reactivity with the change of water height in the central tube has also been investigated in this study. The measured control rod reactivity, core excess reactivity and shutdown margin with WCT are then compared to those with the Dry Central Tube (DCT). The total worth of control rod of BTRR with DCT and WCT have been found to be 16.96 $ and 15.99 $ respectively at 775 MWds burn up. The values of the core excess reactivity and shutdown margin are found as 6.62 $ and 6.29 $ respectively for WCT, and 7.34 $ and 6.12 $ for DCT at 100 W reactor power level. It has been observed that the core excess reactivity decreases with increasing water height in the central tube of the reactor core. On the other hand, the shutdown margin increases with increasing water level. The values of the control rod worth, core excess reactivity and shutdown margin have been found to be within the safety limit as recommended in the General Atomic (GA) Safety Analysis Report (SAR) of BTRR. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available