4.5 Article

Bone marrow PARP1 mRNA levels predict response to treatment with 5-azacytidine in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome

Journal

ANNALS OF HEMATOLOGY
Volume 98, Issue 6, Pages 1383-1392

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00277-019-03650-w

Keywords

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1); Myelodysplastic syndrome; Prognosis; 5-Azacytidine; Response to treatment

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1) is a nuclear enzyme that participates in the DNA repair of malignant cells, with various consequences on their survival. We have recently shown that PARP1 mRNA levels in the bone marrow of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) are correlated to prognosis. To evaluate PARP1 as a biomarker of response to 5-azacytidine in patients with MDS, we measured PARP1 mRNA levels by a quantitative real-time PCR in diagnostic bone marrow samples of 77 patients with MDS treated with 5-azacytidine. Patients with higher PARP1 mRNA levels had a better response to 5-azacytidine per the IWG criteria (p=0.006) and a longer median survival after 5-azacytidine initiation (p=0.033). Multivariate analysis revealed that PARP1 mRNA level was the only factor affecting response to treatment and survival after treatment with 5-azacytidine. A next-generation sequencing for 40 genes of interest in MDS and quantification of the methylation levels of the PARP1 promoter were also carried out in a subset of samples (16 and 18 samples respectively). It is the first time that a single, easily measurable biomarker shows a clear correlation with response to treatment and survival in a patient population consisting of previously untreated patients with MDS homogeneously treated with 5-azacytidine. The fact that PARP1 is also a treatment target in several malignancies underscores the importance of our finding for the potential use of PARP1 inhibitors in MDS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available