4.7 Article

Single drop microextraction in a 96-well plate format: A step toward automated and high-throughput analysis

Journal

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
Volume 1063, Issue -, Pages 159-166

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2019.02.013

Keywords

Magnetic ionic liquids; Parallel single drop microextraction; Sample preparation; Endocrine disrupters compounds; High-throughput; 96-well plate

Funding

  1. Brazilian Government Agency Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologioco (CNPq)
  2. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Santa Catarina (FAPESC)
  3. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, an innovative and high-throughput parallel-single-drop microextraction (Pa-SDME) using the [P-6,6,6,14(+)](2)[ MnCl42-] magnetic ionic liquid (MIL) as extraction phase is demonstrated, for the first time, in the determination of methylparaben, ethylparaben, propylparaben, bisphenol A, butylparaben, benzophenone and triclocarban from environmental aqueous samples. This experimental setup comprised of a 96-well plate system containing a set of magnetic pins which aided in stabilizing the MIL drops and enabled the simultaneous extraction of up to 96 samples. Using this low-cost experimental apparatus, the sample throughput was lower than 1min per sample. This novel approach exhibits a number of advantages over classical SDME approaches, particularly in maintaining a stable solvent microdrop and facilitating high-throughput analysis. Experimental conditions were carefully optimized using one-factor-at-a-time and multivariate designs. The optimal conditions employed 5.38 +/- 0.55 mg (n = 10) of MIL, a sample volume of 1.5 mL at pH 6, and dilution in 20 mL of acetonitrile. The analytical parameters of merit were determined under the optimized conditions and highly satisfactory results were achieved, with LODs ranging from 1.5 to 3 mu g L-1 and coefficients of determination higher than 0.994. Intraday and interday precision ranged from 0.6 to 21.3% (n = 3) and 10.4-20.2% (n = 9), respectively, with analyte relative recovery in three aqueous samples ranging between 63% and 126%. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available