4.7 Review

Electrochemical aptamer-based sensors for food and water analysis: A review

Journal

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
Volume 1051, Issue -, Pages 1-23

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2018.10.058

Keywords

Electrochemical aptasensors; Electroanalytical techniques; Aptamers; Contaminants detection; Food analysis; Water analysis

Funding

  1. Scientific Research Foundation of Yangtze Normal University [2017KYQD122]
  2. Chongqing basic research and frontier exploration special project [cstc2018jcyjAX0637]
  3. Program for Innovative Team Building at Institutions of Higher Education in Chongqing [CXTDX201601039]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51473042, 21776054]
  5. United States Environmental Protection Agency WINSSS

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Global food and water safety issues have prompted the development of highly sensitive, specific, and fast analytical techniques for food and water analysis. The electrochemical aptamer-based detection platform (E-aptasensor) is one of the more promising detection techniques because of its unique combination of advantages that renders these sensors ideal for detection of a wide range of target analytes. Recent research results have further demonstrated that this technique has potential for real world analysis of food and water contaminants. This review summaries the recently developed E-aptasensors for detection of analytes related to food and water safety, including bacteria, mycotoxins, algal toxins, viruses, drugs, pesticides, and metal ions. Ten different electroanalytical techniques and one opto-electroanalytical technique commonly employed with these sensors are also described. In addition to highlighting several novel sensor designs, this review also describes the strengths, limitations, and current challenges this technology faces, and future development trend. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available