4.4 Article

Histopathologic analysis in chronic rhinosinusitis: Impact on quality of life outcomes

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY
Volume 40, Issue 3, Pages 423-426

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2019.03.014

Keywords

Chronic rhinosinusitis; Histopathology; Remodeling; Endoscopic sinus surgery; Quality of life

Funding

  1. Scientific research project of Zhejiang Provincial Department of Health [2018KY062]
  2. Zhejiang Province Traditional Chinese Medicine Science and Technology Plan [2017ZA078]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: This study investigates the impact of histopathologic parameters on quality of life outcomes in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis. Setting: Hospital of Zhejiang University. Study design: Retrospective analysis of collected data. Subjects and methods: One hundred and twenty patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) who underwent endoscopic sinus surgery were recruited. Clinical features, CT evaluation, pre and postoperative SNOT-22 scores and histopathologic findings were collected. Tissue eosinophils and mucosal remodeling were analyzed relative to clinical features and outcomes 12 months postoperatively. Results: Symptom improvement was seen for the entire population. Eosinophilic CRS had significantly worse preoperative and postoperative SNOT-22 scores than non-eosinophilic CRS. Symptom improvement in eosinophilic CRS after surgery was less than that of non-eosinophilic CRS. There was no significant association between preoperative and postoperative SNOT-22 scores and remodeling markers. However, patients with basement membrane thickening showed less reductions of SNOT-22 score postoperatively. Conclusions: Presence of mucosal eosinophilia and basal membrane thickening appear to be the main factors adversely affect the symptom control of surgical intervention. Routine histopathology analysis can provide meaningful information for prognostication of surgical outcome.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available