4.5 Article

Effect of insonation angle on peak systolic velocity variation

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Volume 38, Issue 2, Pages 173-177

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.01.050

Keywords

Peak systolic velocity variation; Ultrasound; Doppler; Insonation angle

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: As point of care ultrasound (POCUS) has become more integrated into emergency and critical care medicine, there has been increased interest in utilizing ultrasound to assess volume status. However, recent studies of carotid POCUS on volume status and fluid responsiveness fail to recognize the effect insonation angle has on their results. To address this, we studied the effect of insonation angle on peak systolic velocity (PSV) change associated with respiratory variation (RV) and passive leg raise (PLR). Methods: Doppler measurements were obtained from 51 subjects presenting to the ED. Minimal and maximal PSV were obtained using insonation angles of 46 degrees, 60 degrees, and 90 degrees. Delta PSV was calculated using PLR and RV as trial methods. Results were categorized into two groups, those with a Delta PSV > 10% and those with a Delta PSV <= 10%. Delta PSV mean and standard error, as well as measures of agreement were calculated. Results: Mean Delta PSV associated with PLR test was 9% in the 46 degrees and 60 degrees groups, and 18% in the 90 degrees group, with standard errors of 6, 7, and 14%, respectively. Using 46 degrees as our relative gold standard, Kappa was 0.23 at 60 degrees and 0.11 at 90 degrees with RV as the trial method, and 0.23 at 60 degrees and 0.01 at 90 degrees with a PLR as the trial method. Conclusions: Variation in PSV is heavily dependent on insonation angle. There was only slight to fair agreement in Delta PSV among the various insonation angles. Further investigation of the optimal insonation angle to assess PSV should be undertaken. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available