4.7 Article

Identification of an Esterase Isolated Using Metagenomic Technology which Displays an Unusual Substrate Scope and its Characterisation as an Enantioselective Biocatalyst

Journal

ADVANCED SYNTHESIS & CATALYSIS
Volume 361, Issue 11, Pages 2466-2474

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adsc.201801691

Keywords

Esterase; Metagenomic Library; Stereochemistry; Biocatalyst; Enantiopurity

Funding

  1. Irish Research Council
  2. GSK [EPSPG/2016/41]
  3. Science Foundation Ireland [12/RC/2275, 13/TIDA/B2625, 12/TIDA/B2411, 12/TIDA/B2405, 14/TIDA/2438, 15/TIDA/2977, SFI09/RFP/BMT2350, FIRM 13/F/516]
  4. Enterprise Ireland [CF-2017-0757-P, IP-2015-0390]
  5. European Commission [607786, FP7-KBBE-2012-6, CP-TP-312184, 311975, OCEAN 2011-2, 287589, EU2020-634486-2015]
  6. Irish Research Council for Science, Engineering and Technology [GOIPG/2014/647]
  7. Health Research Board/Irish Thoracic Society [MRCG-2014-6]
  8. Department of the Marine [BEAU/BIOD/01]
  9. Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, USA [OG1710]
  10. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) [14/TIDA/2438, 12/TIDA/B2411, 13/TIDA/B2625, 15/TIDA/2977] Funding Source: Science Foundation Ireland (SFI)
  11. Irish Research Council (IRC) [EPSPG/2016/41] Funding Source: Irish Research Council (IRC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Evaluation of an esterase annotated as 26D isolated from a marine metagenomic library is described. Esterase 26D was found to have a unique substrate scope, including synthetic transformations which could not be readily effected in a synthetically useful manner using commercially available enzymes. Esterase 26D was more selective towards substrates which had larger, more sterically demanding substituents (i. e. iso-propyl or tert-butyl groups) on the beta-carbon, which is in contrast to previously tested commercially available enzymes which displayed a preference for substrates with sterically less demanding substituents (e.g. methyl group) at the beta-carbon.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available