4.8 Article

Mastering Surface Reconstruction of Metastable Spinel Oxides for Better Water Oxidation

Journal

ADVANCED MATERIALS
Volume 31, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adma.201807898

Keywords

lattice oxygen evolution; M d-band center and O p-band center; oxygen evolution reaction; spinel oxides; surface reconstruction

Funding

  1. Singapore Ministry of Education [MOE2017-T2-1-009]
  2. Singapore National Research Foundation under its Campus for Research Excellence and Technological Enterprise (CREATE) programme

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Developing highly active electrocatalysts for oxygen evolution reaction (OER) is critical for the effectiveness of water splitting. Low-cost spinel oxides have attracted increasing interest as alternatives to noble metal-based OER catalysts. A rational design of spinel catalysts can be guided by studying the structural/elemental properties that determine the reaction mechanism and activity. Here, using density functional theory (DFT) calculations, it is found that the relative position of O p-band and M-Oh (Co and Ni in octahedron) d-band center in ZnCo2-xNixO4 (x = 0-2) correlates with its stability as well as the possibility for lattice oxygen to participate in OER. Therefore, it is testified by synthesizing ZnCo2-xNixO4 spinel oxides, investigating their OER performance and surface evolution. Stable ZnCo2-xNixO4 (x = 0-0.4) follows adsorbate evolving mechanism under OER conditions. Lattice oxygen participates in the OER of metastable ZnCo2-xNixO4 (x = 0.6, 0.8) which gives rise to continuously formed oxyhydroxide as surface-active species and consequently enhances activity. ZnCo1.2Ni0.8O4 exhibits performance superior to the benchmarked IrO2. This work illuminates the design of highly active metastable spinel electrocatalysts through the prediction of the reaction mechanism and OER activity by determining the relative positions of the O p-band and the M-Oh d-band center.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available