4.8 Review

Dynamic Screening and Slow Cooling of Hot Carriers in Lead Halide Perovskites

Journal

ADVANCED MATERIALS
Volume 31, Issue 47, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adma.201803054

Keywords

dielectric function; hot electrons; large polarons; lead halide perovskites; screening

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0010692] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
  2. U.S. Department of Energy [N00014-18-1-2080, DE-SC0010692] Funding Source: Medline
  3. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Science [DE-SC0010692, N00014-18-1-2080] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Among the exceptional properties of lead halide perovskites (LHPs) is the ultraslow cooling of hot carriers. Carrier densities below the Mott density for large polarons (<= approximate to 10(18) cm(-3)) are focused on here. As in other semiconductors, a nascent hot electron distribution initially cools down via emission of longitudinal optical (LO) phonons on the 10(-14)-10(-13) s timescale. What distinguishes LHPs from conventional semiconductors is the exceptionally efficient screening in the former. The dielectric screening in LHPs on the 10(-13) s timescale results in an order-of-magnitude reduction in the Coulomb potential upon the formation of a large polaron, likely with ferroelectric-like local ordering. Further LO-phonon emission is inhibited, and this leads to partial retention of hot electron energy on the 10(-12) s timescale, more so in hybrid LHPs than in their all-inorganic counterparts. Further cooling of hot polarons occurs on the 10(-10) s timescale, and this can be attributed to the slow diffusion of heat out of the large polaron volume due to the low thermal conductivity of LHPs. Like other carrier properties, slow hot carrier cooling in LHPs can be intimately related to efficient screening in a soft, anharmonic, and dynamically disordered lattice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available