4.7 Article

Influence of composition and precipitation evolution on damage at grain boundaries in a crept polycrystalline Ni-based superalloy

Journal

ACTA MATERIALIA
Volume 166, Issue -, Pages 158-167

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2018.12.039

Keywords

Superalloys; Eta phase; Carbides; Decomposition; Borides; Creep; Atom probe tomography; Damage

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The microstructural and compositional evolution of intergranular carbides and borides prior to and after creep deformation at 850 degrees C in a polycrystalline nickel-based superalloy was studied. Primary MC carbides, enveloped within intergranular gamma' layers, decomposed resulting in the formation of layers of the undesirable eta phase. These layers have a composition corresponding to Ni3Ta as measured by atom probe tomography and their structure is consistent with the D0(24) hexagonal structure as revealed by transmission electron microscopy. Electron backscattered diffraction reveals that they assume various misorientations with regard to the adjacent grains. As a consequence, these layers act as brittle recrystallized zones and crack initiation sites. The composition of the MC carbides after creep was altered substantially, with the Ta content decreasing and the Hf and Zr contents increasing, suggesting a beneficial effect of Hf and Zr additions on the stability of MC carbides. By contrast, M5B3 borides were found to be micro structurally stable after creep and without substantial compositional changes. Borides at 850 degrees C were found to coarsen, resulting in some cases into gamma'- depleted zones, where, however, no cracks were observed. The major consequences of secondary phases on the microstructural stability of superalloys during the design of new polycrystalline superalloys are discussed. (C) 2018 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available