4.5 Article

Dealing with sediment transport in flood risk management

Journal

ACTA GEOPHYSICA
Volume 67, Issue 2, Pages 677-685

Publisher

SPRINGER INT PUBL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s11600-019-00273-7

Keywords

Flood risk management plans; Floods directive; iRIC suite; Morphodynamics; Numerical model; Secchia River

Funding

  1. Emilia-Romagna Region (Italy) under the Por-Fesr 2014-2020 Programme
  2. Ministry of Science and Higher Education of Poland [3841/E-41/S/2018]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Flooding events are rising across European watercourses because of changing climatic conditions and anthropogenic pressure. To deal with these events, the European Floods Directive requires the development of flood risk management plans regularly updated every 6years, where areas affected by flood risk and relative management strategies should be identified. Along the Directive, sediment transport and morphological changes in freshwater environments like rivers are only marginally considered, leading to a possibly wrong estimate of the impact of floods in the case of watercourses in which sediment transport represents a fundamental component. Using the Secchia River in Italy as a case study, the paper compares two numerical simulations performed with the freeware iRIC suite, imposing the same boundary conditions but comparing fixed and mobile bed. The obtained results pinpoint the importance of considering sediment transport in drawing flooding scenarios for alluvial sandy rivers. As suggested by this example, for the incoming revisions of the flood risk management plans, forecasted by 2021, water managers should account for the dynamic behaviour of surface watercourses, considering sediments not only as a driver of pollutants but also as a key aspect that shapes the environment and should be considered in modelling future scenarios and drawing associated management strategies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available