4.8 Article

Molecular-Level Profiling of Human Serum Transferrin Protein through Assessment of Nanopore-Based Electrical and Chemical Responsiveness

Journal

ACS NANO
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages 4246-4254

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.8b09293

Keywords

human serum transferrin; nanopore; controlled dielectric breakdown; electrophoresis; protein conformation; excluded volume

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [1707818, 1712069]
  2. National Institutes of Health [R03EB022759]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [NRF-2015K1A4A3047100, NRF-2015M3A7B6027973, NRF-2015M3A6B3068660]
  4. Directorate For Engineering
  5. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn [1712069] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Directorate For Engineering
  7. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn [1707818] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, we investigated the voltage and pH responsiveness of human serum transferrin (hSTf) protein using silicon nitride (SixNy) nanopores. The Fe(III)-rich holo form of hSTf was dominant when pH > pI, while the Fe(III)-free apo form was dominant when pH < pI. The translocations of hSTf were purely in an electrophoretic sense, thus depended on its pI and the solution pH. With increasing voltage, voltage driven protein unfolding became prominent which was indicated by the trends associated with change in conductance, due to hSTf translocation, and in the excluded electrolyte volume. Additionally, analysis of the translocation events of the pure apo form of hSTf showed a clear difference in the event population compared to that of the holo form. The results obtained demonstrate the successful application of nanopore devices to distinguish between the holo and apo forms of hSTf in a mixture and to analyze its folding and unfolding phenomenon over a range of pH and applied voltages.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available