4.8 Article

Customizing Morphology, Size, and Response Kinetics of Matrix Metalloproteinase-Responsive Nanostructures by Systematic Peptide Design

Journal

ACS NANO
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages 1555-1562

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.8b07401

Keywords

MMP-responsive; enzyme kinetics; electrostatic enzyme interactions; supramolecular organization; morphology change; self-assembling peptides

Funding

  1. City University of New York
  2. Tow Foundation Graduate Fellowship from the MSKCC Center for Molecular Imaging and Nanotechnology
  3. SEED Grant CUNY-Advanced Science Research Center Program
  4. National Cancer Institute (NCI)
  5. National Institute for General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) [1SC1CA182844, 2SC1 GM127278-05A1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Overexpression and activation of matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) is associated with multiple diseases and can serve as a stimulus to activate nanomaterials for sensing and controlled release. In order to achieve autonomous therapeutics with improved spacetime targeting capabilities, several features need to be considered beyond the introduction of an enzyme cleavable linker into a nanostructure. We introduce guiding principles for a customizable platform using supra molecular peptide nanostructures with three modular components to achieve tunable kinetics and morphology changes upon MMP-9 exposure. This approach enables (1) fine-tuning of kinetics through introduction of ordered/disordered structures, (2) a 12-fold variation in hydrolysis rates achieved by electrostatic (mis)matching of particle and enzyme charge, and (3) selection of enzymatic reaction products that are either cell-killing nanofibers or disintegrate. These guiding principles, which can be rationalized and involve exchange of just a few amino acids, enable systematic customization of enzyme-responsive peptide optimization of enzyme responsive materials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available