4.8 Article

Efficient Intracellular Delivery of RNase A Using DNA Origami Carriers

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 11, Issue 12, Pages 11112-11118

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.8b21724

Keywords

DNA origami; RNase A; self-assembly; protein delivery; cancer therapy

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Programs of China [2016YFA0201601, 2018YFA0208900]
  2. National Natural Science Foundations of China [21573051, 31700871, 21708004, 51761145044]
  3. Science Fund for Creative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [21721002]
  4. Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission [Z161100000116036]
  5. Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences, CAS [QYZDB-SSW-SLH029]
  6. CAS Interdisciplinary Innovation Team
  7. K. C. Wong Education Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Delivery of proteins to carry out desired biological functions is a direct approach for disease treatment. However, protein therapy is still facing challenges due to low delivery efficiency, poor targeting during trafficking, insufficient therapeutic efficacy, and possible toxicity induced by carriers. Here, we present a novel delivery platform based on DNA origami nanostructure that enables tumor cell transportation of active proteins for cancer therapy. In our design, cytotoxic protein ribonuclease (RNase) A molecules are organized on the rectangular DNA origami nanosheets, which work as nanovehicles to deliver RNase A molecules into the cytoplasm and execute their cell-killing function inside the tumor cells. Cancer cell-targeting aptamers are also integrated onto the DNA origami-based nanoplatform to enhance its targeting effect. This DNA origami protein coassembling strategy can be further developed to transport other functional proteins and therapeutic components simultaneously for synergistic effects and be adapted for integrated diagnostics and therapeutics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available