4.2 Article

Enhancing Genomic Laboratory Reports: A Qualitative Analysis of Provider Review

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A
Volume 170, Issue 5, Pages 1134-1141

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.37573

Keywords

genomics; laboratory reports; provider communication; patient communication

Funding

  1. Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute [CD-1304-6987]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reports on the responses of physicians who reviewed provider and patient versions of a genomic laboratory report designed to communicate results of whole genome sequencing. Semi-structured interviews addressed concept communication, elements, and format of example genome reports. Analysis of the coded transcripts resulted in recognition of three constructs around communication of genome sequencing results: (1) Providers agreed that whole genomic sequencing results are complex and they welcomed a report that provided supportive interpretation information to accompany sequencing results; (2) Providers strongly endorsed a report that included active clinical guidance, such as reference to practice guidelines, if available; and (3) Providers valued the genomic report as a resource that would serve as the basis to facilitate communication of genome sequencing results with their patients and families. Providers valued both versions of the report, though they affirmed the need for a provider-oriented report. Critical elements of the report included clear language to explain the result, as well as consolidated yet comprehensive prognostic information with clear guidance over time for the clinical care of the patient. Most importantly, it appears a report with this design has the potential not only to return results but also serves as a communication tool to help providers and patients discuss and coordinate care over time. (C) 2016 The Authors. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available