4.6 Article

Vitamin E-Coated and Heparin-Coated Dialyzer Membranes for Heparin-Free Hemodialysis: A Multicenter, Randomized, Crossover Trial

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES
Volume 68, Issue 5, Pages 752-762

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.05.013

Keywords

Heparin-free hemodialysis; vitamin E-coated dialyzer; heparin-coated dialyzer; blood circuit clotting; fibrin ring; anticoagulation; saline flushes; end-stage renal disease (ESRD); randomized controlled trial; non-inferiority trial

Funding

  1. Hemotech Pharmaceutical

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Hemodialysis requires effective anticoagulation to avoid blood circuit clotting. In patients at high risk for bleeding, several alternative methods have been developed. Study Design: Multicenter, prospective, randomized, crossover study evaluating the noninferiority of vitamin E-coated compared with heparin-coated dialyzers in a 4-hour heparin-free hemodialysis strategy. Settings & Participants: 32 adult long-term hemodialysis patients from 2 French hemodialysis units with well-functioning fistulas or double-lumen catheters. Intervention: Patients were randomly allocated to a first period using either vitamin E- or heparin-coated dialyzers. After a washout period of 2 hemodialysis sessions, each patient was switched to the alternative dialyzer for a second period. Each study period started with 2 hemodialysis sessions with reduced heparin dose 950% and 25% of usual heparin dose, respectively, for sessions 1 and 2) followed by 2 heparin-free sessions. Outcomes: The primary end point was the percentage of successful study periods, defined as no circuit-clotting event leading to premature interruption of any of the 4 dialysis sessions. Secondary end points included total number and cumulative duration of hemodialysis sessions without clotting, number of saline solution flushes, dialysis circuit bubble trap status and dialyzer membrane status by visual inspection, and dialysis adequacy. Results: The percentage of success with vitamin E-coated dialyzers 925/32 study periods [78%]) was not inferior to that with heparin-coated dialyzers 926/32 study periods [81%]). Visual inspection showed equal numbers of clean dialysis circuit bubble traps 9vitamin E-coated, 34/ 121; heparin-coated, 32/120), whereas clean fiber bundles were more frequently noted with the vitamin E-coated compared with heparin-coated dialyzers 925/121 vs 2/120; P = 0.002). Limitations: Results may not extrapolate to critically ill patients. Differences in dialyzer transparency may account for visual inspection scores. Conclusions: The success rate of 4-hour heparin-free hemodialysis sessions is lower than that previously claimed in uncontrolled studies. Vitamin E-coated and heparin-coated dialyzers exposed patients to similar and unacceptable high failure rates. Further studies are required to improve heparin-free hemodialysis. (C) 2016 by the National Kidney Foundation, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available