4.5 Review

Systematic Review of Cognitive Effects of Electroconvulsive Therapy in Late-Life Depression

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages 547-565

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jagp.2016.02.053

Keywords

geriatric; elderly; depression; cognition; ECT; brain stimulation

Funding

  1. Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH) fellowship award
  2. Brain and Behavior Research Foundation [22293]
  3. Brain Canada
  4. CAMH Foundation
  5. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
  6. U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH)
  7. NIH
  8. CIHR
  9. Temerty Family through the CAMH Foundation
  10. Campbell Research Institute
  11. Brainsway Ltd.
  12. Brainsway Inc.
  13. Ontario Mental Health Foundation
  14. Brain and Behavior Research Foundation
  15. Temerty Family
  16. Grant Family
  17. Campbell Institute
  18. Canada Research Chair
  19. Canadian Foundation for Innovation
  20. Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care
  21. Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation
  22. W. Garfield Weston Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Late-life depression (LLD) is known to negatively impact cognition even after remission of mood symptoms. Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) and newer nonconvulsive electrical and magnetic brain stimulation interventions have been shown to have cognitive effects in patients with neuropsychiatric disorders. Methods: This review systematically assessed the effects of ECT on cognition in LLD. EMBASE, Ovid Medline, and PsycINFO were systematically searched through June 2015. The search was limited to publications from peer-reviewed journals in the English language. Results: A total of 5,154 publications was identified; 318 were reviewed in full text, of which 39 publications related to ECT were included. We focused this review only on ECT because evidence on newer interventions was deemed insufficient for a systematic review. This literature suggests increased rates of interictal and postictal cognitive decline with ECT but no long-term (i.e., 6 months or longer) deleterious effects on cognition. Instead, long-term cognitive outcomes with ECT have been reported as either not changed or improved. This literature favors nondominant unilateral ECT over bilateral ECT for cognition. Conclusion: Published literature on brain stimulation interventions in LLD is mainly limited to ECT. This literature suggests that deleterious effects of ECT in LLD are limited and transient, with better cognitive outcomes with unilateral ECT. There is not enough evidence to fully characterize long-term deleterious effects of ECT or effects of newer brain stimulation techniques on cognition in LLD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available