4.5 Article

Terminal QRS distortion is present in anterior myocardial infarction but absent in early repolarization

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Volume 34, Issue 11, Pages 2182-2185

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.08.053

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Early repolarization (ER) and acute left anterior descending artery occlusion (LADO) may be difficult to distinguish. Terminal QRS distortion (TQRSD), defined by the absence of both an S wave and J wave in either of leads V-2 or V-3, is often present in anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. We hypothesized that this finding would always be absent in ER. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of electrocardiograms (ECGs) of consecutive patients who presented to the emergency department with ischemic symptoms and had a cardiologist interpretation of benign ER on the initial emergency department ECG. All ECGs were scrutinized for the presence of an S wave and a J wave in leads V2 and V3. Differences in S-wave amplitudes between complexes with and without J waves were analyzed using nonparametric Mann-Whitney testing and confidence intervals around a proportion. Results: One hundred seventy-one patients were identified with benign ER. Zero of 171 had TQRSD (specificity for LADO, 100%; 95% confidence interval, 97.8-100). In lead V-2, S waves were absent in only 1 of 171 ECGs; however, in that ECG, a J wave measuring 0.5 mm was present. In lead V-3, S waves were absent in 16 ECGs, but all of these ECGs had J waves. When J waves were absent in leads V-2 or V-3, the corresponding S waves were deeper than S waves in QRS complexes with J waves. Conclusion: Terminal QRS distortion was never observed in benign ER. Based on previous studies indicating the presence of TQRSD in LADO, it was, thus, 100% specific to LADO when the differential diagnosis was acute myocardial infarction vs ER. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available