4.7 Article

Consumption of fruit and vegetables and risk of frailty: a dose-response analysis of 3 prospective cohorts of community-dwelling older adults

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION
Volume 104, Issue 1, Pages 132-142

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.115.125781

Keywords

fruits; vegetables; elderly; frailty; exhaustion; slow walking speed

Funding

  1. Health Research Fund grant [12/1166]
  2. FRAILOMIC initiative FP7-HEALTH [305483-2]
  3. Ageing Trajectories of Health: Longitudinal Opportunities and Synergies project
  4. Foundation for Medical Research
  5. French National Agency for Salaried Workers
  6. General Directorate of Health regional council of Aquitaine
  7. General Directorate of Health regional council of Bourgogne
  8. Foundation of France
  9. Ministry of Research-French Institute of Health and Medical Research cohorts and collections of biological data program
  10. Alzheimer Foundation Plan
  11. French National Solidarity Agency for Autonomy
  12. Longevity and Aging Program
  13. AGRICA
  14. Autonomous Mutual Fund of Supplementary Pension in Agriculture (Caisse Mutuelle Autonome de Retraites Complementaries Agricoles)
  15. Supplementary Pension Institution of the Executive Employees in Agriculture (Institution de retraite complementaire des salaries cadres de l'agriculture)
  16. Central Fund of Agricultural Mutual Provident (Caisse Centrate de Provoyance Mutuelle Agricole)
  17. Provident Fund of the Executive and Middle managers in Agricultural companies (Caisse de Prevoyance des Cadres d'Entreprises Agricoles)
  18. AGRI Provident
  19. Central Social Mutual Agricultural Fund
  20. la the Gironde Social Mutual Agricultural Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Consuming fruit and vegetables (FVs) may protect against frailty, but to our knowledge no study has yet assessed their prospective dose-response relation. Objective: We sought to examine the dose-response association between FV consumption and the risk of frailty in older adults. Design: Data were taken from 3 independent cohorts of community dwelling older adults: the Seniors-ENRICA (Study on Nutrition and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Spain) cohort (n = 1872), Three-City (3C) Bordeaux cohort (n = 580, and integrated multidisciplinary approach cohort (n = 473). Baseline food consumption was assessed with a validated computerized diet history (Seniors-ENRICA) or with a food-frequency questionnaire (3C Bordeaux and AMI). In all cohorts, incident frailty was assessed with the use of the Fried criteria. Results across cohorts were pooled with the use of a random effects model. Results: During a mean 2.5-y follow-up, 300 incident frailty cases occurred. Fully adjusted models showed that the pooled ORs (95% CIs) of incident frailty comparing participants who consumed 1, 2, or >= 3 portions of fruit/d to those with no consumption were, respectively, 0.59 (0.27, 0.90), 0.58 (0.29, 0.86), and 0.48 (0.20, 0.75), with a P-trend of 0.04. The corresponding values for vegetables were 0.69 (0.42, 0.97), 0.56 (0.35, 0.77), and 0.52 (0.13, 0.92), with a P-trend < 0.01. When FVs were analyzed together, the pooled ORs (95% CIs) of incident frailty were 0.41 (0.21, 0.60), 0.47 (0.25, 0.68), 0.36 (0.18, 0.53), and 0.31 (0.13, 0.48), with a P-trend < 0.01 for participants who consumed 2, 3, 4, or >= 5 portions/d, respectively, compared with those who consumed <= 1 portion/d. An inverse dose-response relation was also found between the baseline consumption of fruit and risk of exhaustion, low physical activity, and slow walking speed, whereas the consumption of vegetables was associated with a decreased risk of exhaustion and unintentional weight loss. Conclusions: Among community-dwelling older adults, FV consumption was associated with a lower short-term risk of frailty in a dose response manner, and the strongest association was obtained with 3 portions of fruit/d and 2 portions of vegetables/d.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available