4.7 Article

ShopSmart 4 Health: results of a randomized controlled trial of a behavioral intervention promoting fruit and vegetable consumption among socioeconomically disadvantaged women

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION
Volume 104, Issue 2, Pages 436-445

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.116.133173

Keywords

nutrition intervention; randomized controlled trial; socioeconomic disadvantage; disadvantaged women; fruit and vegetables

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council's Linkage Projects funding scheme [LP0990129]
  2. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Principal Research Fellowship [ID 1042442]
  3. NHMRC Career Development Fellowship Level 2 [1104636]
  4. Australian Research Council [LP0990129] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Behavioral interventions show potential for promoting increased fruit and vegetable consumption in the general population. However, little is known about their effectiveness or cost-effectiveness among socioeconomically disadvantaged groups, who are less likely to consume adequate fruit and vegetables. Objective: This study investigated the effects and costs of a behavior change intervention for increasing fruit and vegetable purchasing and consumption among socioeconomically disadvantaged women. Design: ShopSmart 4 Health was a randomized controlled trial involving a 3-mo retrospective baseline data collection phase [ time (T) 0], a 6-mo intervention (T1-T2), and a 6-mo no-intervention follow-up (T3). Socioeconomically disadvantaged women who were primary household shoppers in Melbourne, Australia, were randomly assigned to either a behavior change intervention arm (n = 124) or a control arm (n = 124). Supermarket transaction (sales) data and surveys measured the main outcomes: fruit and vegetable purchases and self-reported fruit and vegetable consumption. Results: An analysis of supermarket transaction data showed no significant intervention effects on vegetable or fruit purchasing at T2 or T3. Participants in the behavior change intervention arm reported consumption of significantly more vegetables during the intervention (T2) than did controls, with smaller intervention effects sustained at 6 mo postintervention (T3). Relative to controls, vegetable consumption increased by similar to 0.5 serving.participant(-1) . d(-1) from baseline to T2 and remained 0.28 servings/d higher than baseline at T3 among those who received the intervention. There was no intervention effect on reported fruit consumption. The behavior change intervention cost A$3.10 (in Australian dollars) . increased serving of vegetables(-1) . d(-1). Conclusions: This behavioral intervention increased vegetable consumption among socioeconomically disadvantaged women. However, the lack of observed effects on fruit consumption and on both fruit and vegetable purchasing at intervention stores suggests that further investigation of effective nutrition promotion approaches for this key target group is required.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available