4.7 Article

Cypiripi: exact genotyping of CYP2D6 using high-throughput sequencing data

Journal

BIOINFORMATICS
Volume 31, Issue 12, Pages 27-34

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv232

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery Frontiers project, The Cancer Genome Collaboratory
  2. Vanier Canada Graduate Scholarship program
  3. NSERC Create
  4. NIH [R01GM088076]
  5. NIH IGNITE project grant [U01HG007762]
  6. NSERC Discovery Grants program and Genome Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Motivation: CYP2D6 is highly polymorphic gene which encodes the (CYP2D6) enzyme, involved in the metabolism of 20-25% of all clinically prescribed drugs and other xenobiotics in the human body. CYP2D6 genotyping is recommended prior to treatment decisions involving one or more of the numerous drugs sensitive to CYP2D6 allelic composition. In this context, high-throughput sequencing (HTS) technologies provide a promising time-efficient and cost-effective alternative to currently used genotyping techniques. To achieve accurate interpretation of HTS data, however, one needs to overcome several obstacles such as high sequence similarity and genetic recombinations between CYP2D6 and evolutionarily related pseudogenes CYP2D7 and CYP2D8, high copy number variation among individuals and short read lengths generated by HTS technologies. Results: In this work, we present the first algorithm to computationally infer CYP2D6 genotype at basepair resolution from HTS data. Our algorithm is able to resolve complex genotypes, including alleles that are the products of duplication, deletion and fusion events involving CYP2D6 and its evolutionarily related cousin CYP2D7. Through extensive experiments using simulated and real datasets, we show that our algorithm accurately solves this important problem with potential clinical implications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available