4.2 Review

Clinical Pharmacology and Cardiovascular Safety of Naproxen

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR DRUGS
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages 97-107

Publisher

ADIS INT LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s40256-016-0200-5

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Bayer
  2. Amgen
  3. Sanofi
  4. Eli Lilly
  5. DaiichiSankyo
  6. The Medicines Company
  7. AstraZeneca
  8. Merck
  9. Pfizer
  10. PLx Pharma
  11. CeloNova
  12. Johnson Johnson
  13. St. Jude Medical
  14. GlaxoSmithKline
  15. Daiichi-Sankyo
  16. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  17. Osprey Medical, Inc.
  18. Novartis
  19. CSL Behring
  20. Gilead

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The voluntary withdrawal of Vioxx (rofecoxib) from the market in 2004, as well as the 2005 and 2014 US FDA Advisory Committee meetings about non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and cardiovascular risk, have raised questions surrounding the use of NSAIDs in at-risk populations. This paper discusses the cardiovascular safety profile of naproxen in the context of the NSAID class. The balance of evidence suggests that cardiovascular risk correlates with cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 selectivity, and the low COX-2 selectivity of naproxen results in a lower cardiovascular risk than that of other NSAIDs. The over-the-counter (OTC) use of naproxen is expected to pose minimal cardiovascular risk; however, the benefit-risk ratio and appropriate use should be considered at an individual patient level, particularly to assess underlying conditions that may increase the risk of events. Likewise, regulatory authorities should revisit label information periodically to ensure labeling reflects the current understanding of benefits and risks.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available