4.4 Article

Risk Factor Optimization and Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy in US Veterans With Peripheral Arterial and Ischemic Cerebrovascular Disease Compared to Veterans With Coronary Heart Disease

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 118, Issue 8, Pages 1144-1149

Publisher

EXCERPTA MEDICA INC-ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.07.027

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health [T32HL110837]
  2. Abbott Diagnostic
  3. Amarin
  4. Amgen
  5. Eli Lilly
  6. Esperion
  7. Novartis
  8. Pfizer
  9. Otsuka
  10. Regeneron
  11. Roche Diagnostic
  12. Sanofi-Synthelabo
  13. Takeda
  14. NIH
  15. AHA
  16. ADA
  17. Abbott Diagnostics
  18. Astra Zeneca
  19. Genzyme
  20. Ionis
  21. Matinas BioPharma Inc
  22. Merck
  23. Department of Veterans Affairs
  24. American Diabetes Association
  25. American Heart Association

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a systemic process involving multiple vascular beds and includes coronary heart disease (CHD), ischemic cerebrovascular disease (ICVD), and peripheral arterial disease (PAD). All these manifestations are associated with an increased risk of subsequent myocardial infarction, stroke, and death. Guideline-directed medical therapy is recommended for all patients with CVD. In a cohort of US veterans, we identified 1,242,015 patients with CVD receiving care in 130 Veterans Affairs facilities from October 1, 2013 to September 30, 2014. CVD included diagnoses of CHD, PAD, or ICVD. We assessed the frequency of risk factor optimization and the use of guideline-directed medical therapy in patients with CHD, PAD alone, ICVD alone, and PAD + ICVD groups. A composite of 4 measures (blood pressure <140/90 mm Hg, A1c <7% in diabetics, statin use, and antiplatelet use in eligible patients), termed optimal medical therapy (OMT) was compared among groups. Multivariate logistic regression was performed with CHD as the referent category. CHD comprised 989,380 (79.7%), PAD alone. 70,404 (5.7%), ICVD alone 163,730 (13.2%), and PAD + ICVD 18,501 (1.5%) of the cohort. Overall, only 36% received OMT with adjusted odds ratios of 0.54 (95% CI 0.53 to 0.55), 0.77 (0.76 to 0.78), and 0.97 (0.94 to 1.00) for patients with PAD alone, ICVD alone, and PAD + ICVD, respectively, compared with patients with CHD. In conclusion, OMT was low in all groups. Patients with PAD alone and ICVD alone were less likely to receive OMT than those with CAD and PAD + ICVD. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. (Am J Cardiol 2016;118:1144-1149)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available