4.7 Article

Subjective memory decline predicts greater rates of clinical progression in preclinical Alzheimer's disease

Journal

Alzheimers & Dementia
Volume 12, Issue 7, Pages 796-804

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2015.12.013

Keywords

Preclinical AD; Prodromal AD; Subjective cognitive decline; Subjective memory decline cognitively normal older adults; Amyloid; PET imaging

Funding

  1. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
  2. Science and Industry Endowment Fund
  3. National Health and Medical Research Council
  4. Dementia Collaborative Research Centres

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: The objective of this study was to determine the utility of subjective memory decline (SMD) to predict episodic memory change and rates of clinical progression in cognitively normal older adults with evidence of high beta-amyloid burden (CN A beta+). Methods: Fifty-eight CN A beta+ participants from the Australian Imaging, Biomarkers, and Lifestyle study responded to an SMD questionnaire and underwent comprehensive neuropsychological assessments. Participant data for three follow-up assessments were analyzed. Results: In CN A beta+, subjects with high SMD did not exhibit significantly greater episodic memory decline than those with low SMD. High SMD was related to greater rates of progression to mild cognitive impairment or Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia (hazard ratio = 5.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-20.0, P = .02) compared with low SMD. High SMD was associated with greater depressive symptomatology and smaller left hippocampal volume. Discussion: High SMD is a harbinger of greater rates of clinical progression in preclinical AD. Although SMD reflects broader diagnostic implications for CN A beta+, more sensitive measures may be required to detect early subtle cognitive change. (C) 2016 The Alzheimer's Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available