4.7 Article

Importance of home study visit capacity in dementia studies

Journal

ALZHEIMERS & DEMENTIA
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages 419-426

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2015.10.007

Keywords

Home research study visits; Research clinic study visits; Missing data; Bias; Prospective studies; Cohort studies; Longitudinal studies; Inference; Dementia; Neuropathology

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Aging [U01 AG 06781, P50 AG-05136]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: The importance of home research study visit capacity in Alzheimer's disease (AD) studies is unknown. Methods: All evaluations are from the prospective Adult Changes in Thought study. Based on analyses of factors associated with volunteering for a new in-clinic initiative, we analyzed AD risk factors and the relevance of neuropathologic findings for dementia comparing all data including home visits, and in-clinic data only. We performed bootstrapping to determine whether differences were greater than expected by chance. Results: Of the 1781 people enrolled during 1994-1996 with >= 1 follow-up, 1369 (77%) had inclinic data, covering 61% of follow-up time. In-clinic data resulted in excluding 76% of incident dementia and AD cases. AD risk factors and the relevance of neuropathologic findings for dementia were both different with in-clinic data. Discussion: Limiting data collection in AD studies to research clinics alone likely reduces power and also can lead to erroneous inferences. (C) 2016 The Alzheimer's Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available