4.7 Article

Technical performance of a novel, fully automated electrochemiluminescence immunoassay for the quantitation of β-amyloid (1-42) in human cerebrospinal fluid

Journal

ALZHEIMERS & DEMENTIA
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages 517-526

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2015.09.009

Keywords

Amyloid; Amyloid-beta 1-42; Alzheimer's disease; Assay; Biomarker; Cerebrospinal fluid; Dementia; Diagnosis; Electrochemiluminescence; Immunoassay; Method comparison; Precision; Repeatability; Reproducibility; Variability

Funding

  1. Roche Diagnostics GmbH
  2. Torsten Soderberg Foundation at Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Stockholm, Sweden

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Available assays for quantitation of the Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarker amyloid-beta 1-42 (A beta [1-42]) in cerebrospinal fluid demonstrate significant variability and lack of standardization to reference measurement procedures (RMPs). We report analytical performance data for the novel Elecsys beta-amyloid (1-42) assay (Roche Diagnostics). Methods: Lot-to-lot comparability was tested using method comparison. Performance parameters were measured according to Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines. The assay was standardized to a Joint Committee for Traceability in Laboratory Medicine (JCTLM) approved RMP. Results: Limit of quantitation was <11.28 pg/mL, and the assay was linear throughout the measuring range (200-1700 pg/mL). Excellent lot-to-lot comparability was observed (correlation coefficients [Pearson's, r] >0.995; bias in medical decision area <2%). Repeatability coefficients of variation (CVs) were 1.0%-1.6%, intermediate CVs were 1.9%-4.0%, and intermodule CVs were 1.1%-3.9%. Estimated total reproducibility was 2.0%-5.1%. Correlation with the RMP was good (Pearson's r, 0.93). Discussion: The Elecsys beta-amyloid (1-42) assay has high analytical performance that may improve biomarker-based AD diagnosis. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of Alzheimer's Association.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available