4.1 Article

Influence of Perceived Stress on Incident Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment Results From the Einstein Aging Study

Journal

ALZHEIMER DISEASE & ASSOCIATED DISORDERS
Volume 30, Issue 2, Pages 93-98

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/WAD.0000000000000125

Keywords

mild cognitive impairment; perceived stress; remediable risk factor; apolipoprotein epsilon 4

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health from National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) [NIA 2 P01 AG03949, NIA 1R01AG039409-01, NIA R03 AG045474, CTSA 1UL1TR001073]
  2. Leonard and Sylvia Marx Foundation
  3. Czap Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Stress is a potentially remediable risk factor for amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI). Our objective is to determine whether perceived stress predicts incident aMCI and to determine if the influence of stress on aMCI is independent of known aMCI risk factors, particularly demographic variables, depression, and apolipoprotein genotype. The Einstein Aging Study is a longitudinal community-based study of older adults. The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) was administered annually in the Einstein Aging Study to participants (N= 507; 71 developed incident aMCI; mean follow-up time= 3.6 y, SD= 2.0) who were aged 70 years and older, free of aMCI and dementia at baseline PSS administration, and had at least 1 subsequent annual follow-up. Cox hazard models were used to examine time to aMCI onset adjusting for covariates. High levels of perceived stress are associated with a 30% greater risk of incident aMCI (per 5-point increase in PSS: hazard ratio= 1.30; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-1.58) independent of covariates. The consistency of results after covariate adjustment and the lack of evidence for reverse causation in longitudinal analyses suggest that these findings are robust. Understanding of the effect of perceived stress on cognition may lead to intervention strategies that prevent the onset of aMCI and Alzheimer dementia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available